Breivik Files October 2009
Yes, this case MUST not be underestimated. It is instrumental in validating the following:
Labour wants mass immigration to engineer multicultural UK, says former Blair and Straw adviser.
Labour threw open Britain's borders to mass immigration to help socially engineer a "truly multicultural" country, a former Government adviser has revealed.
The former Labour adviser said the Government opened up UK borders partly to humiliate Right-wing opponents of immigration.
This proves that some of the motivations behind mass immigration are not based on humanism, much more is due, for example, outright hatred of people with conservative values, like ourselves, the cultural conservatives. Many of them are HATERS of everything European and wish to destroy us under the pretense of multiculturalism. Multiculturalism is a anti-European hate ideology designed to destroy European cultures, traditions, identity, Christianity and the sovereignty of nations. The ultimate goal is a Marxist super state. In order to accomplish this, first all of Europe must be annihilated. Of course there are genuine humanists (that are only suicidal and naive) but my suspicion is that the great majority of them are cultural Marxists with clear hateful intentions.
Possible is that the following proportions are not far-fetched:
Opponents of cultural conservative doctrines:
Cultural Marxists: 30% (hateful intentions)
Suicidal Humanists: 65% (naive)
Capitalist globalists: 5% (greedy)
Has anyone else researched or estimated our opponent intentions? This will be relevant to eventual Nurnberg processes in the future. It is of course very difficult to prove this because almost everybody is using humanistic cultural Marxist slogans these days.
By the way, good post Fjordmann
What most people still fail to understand is that the on-going Islamization (secondary process) of Europe cannot be stopped without settling for the political doctrines that could make these possible (and with the individuals who embody these doctrines). These must be more focus on battling multicultural doctrines (multiculturalism = cultural Marxism) because this is the ideology that enables political mechanisms that result in on-going Islamization (Islamic demographic warfare). People must learn what multicultural doctrines do with Europe:
Systematic breakdown of:
- European Christianity
- European tradition
- European cultures
- European and national identity
- National states
It is self-evident that cultural Marxists and humanists in Europe think that they can reform Islam but they will fail like they have failed in everything before. We, on the other hand, the cultural conservatives and anti-Marxist liberals, most focus on the fundamental problem of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and on how to combat this hate ideology. It can only be stopped through the continuous consolation of cultural conservative ideologies by individuals standing as a front thereof. We need to focus on the preservation of our alternative and our doctrine. Further consolidation of the cultural conservative ideology is the solution. We need to help in the awakening of the people through political activism against specific targets.
Four important tasks in the next twenty years are as follows:
1. To have a cultural conservative newspaper news paper with national distribution (it will be the only newspaper to support the FrP in 4 years). Trust me, FrP will be sabotaged and torpedoed by everyone (the voter base of 35% are about 20% scared).
2. Develop an alternative to the violent extremist Norwegian Marxist organizations such as Blitz, SOS Racism and Red Youth. This can be achieved for example by supporting the SIOE. Conservative people do not dare express their viewpoints in the street because they know that extreme Marxist will subject them to harassment. We cannot tolerate Labour to sponsor these violent "Stoltenberg jugend" that systematically terrorizes political conservatives.
3. Work toward gaining control of 10-15 NGO's (cultural Marxists controls at present 10-15 while we only have 2 or 3)
4. Initiate a partnership with conservative forces within the Norwegian church. I know that the liberal forces within the European anti-Jihad movement (Bruce Bawer among others and yet liberals too) will see a problem with our line but the conservative churches within the church is in fact one of our best allies. Our main opponents are not Jihadists but rather Jihadist friends - namely, the multiculturalists.
A nightmare scenario would be that the multiculturalists would play Ataturk in Western Europe. The result of which would be a long and slow death for Europe, just as in the case of Lebanon. The example of Turkey proves that a Muslim population can be prevented by force under an authoritarian regime, from demanding Shaaria for about 100 years or longer, but in the future the possibility opens up once again. This combined with the ability for Islamic demographic warfare is leading to an imminent disaster.
You should notice as well that the majority of Christians in Lebanon were cultural Marxists that embodied the multicultural doctrines from 1911 on (there were just too few in fronts that battled for nationalism and separatism from Muslims). We know very well that this ended up in a tragedy.
Lebanon demographical development – (Christian/Muslim pop):
1911 - 21% Islam (79% Christians)
1921 - 45%
1932 - 49%
1943 - 48%
1970 - 58% (Civil war 1975–1990 started when Islam reached 60%)
1990 - 65% (Christians lost the war)
2008 - 75%
The worst of all is that many more examples of this can be documented in Western Europe, which is already Lebanon in effect.
Let's make sure to focus on real evil - multiculturalism, and not in the result or consequence of this evil. When there's a water leak, then do focus on the leak first, do not flush the water! ;)
O Tomass Mark, Game theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln; June 1997.
The problem is largely underresearched.
If we are working toward a 'temporarily secular' Islam in Europe by supporting individuals that is playing a Kokkvold (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Per_Edgar_Kokkvold), it is the equivalent of shooting ourselves. The only thing that will be secular is the visual aspect, while the destructive elements of Islam - demographic warfare, will continue in silence. This was is accepted by all as long as there is no visual factor.
Moderate multiculturalists like Kokkvold may thus prove to be even more destructive for Europe than the more extreme multiculturalists.