Saturday, July 23, 2011

Breivik Files: Introduction & Files September 2009 Part I


The news about the horrible day that just passed in the Kingdom of Norway are perhaps somewhat old already, and yet no less shocking. Perhaps we are still going to hear much more than we have until now about the particular details. What I am doing here is reproducing in more or less simple English and in full, using my knowledge of Norwegian, already somewhat rusty from years of non-use, to translate the vast material that Mr. Breivik, the shooter of Norway, left in this website as unmistakable proof of his views that can be found here The material runs to dozens of pages and I will do my best to present them all in English as soon as possible. It is truly worrying what one reads here because to be sure it is not frenzy or madness what we see, but eloquence and intelligence, sophisticated speech and more than anything lofty ideals. Contrary to what has been said, Document, is not a magazine that preaches Islam-hatred though its 'cultural conservative' line could be understood in many ways. When I began doing some research about the Dutch identity in 2009, because of similar but infinitely less compromising situations, I thought that the concept of multicultural society would come under fire many times during our generation. The information contained in these texts, more than being the journal of a killer with all the pathos involved, it is a great source material for citizens, academics, policy makers, journalists and the like to take a look into what's really happening in our midst, and perhaps if this would've been taken seriously at all by anyone, great damage could have been prevented, but there was no way to know this, reason for which, everything that is addressed in these countless pages must be read critically and not left to obscure forums to decide on, but brought to the fore of the public space. The consequences of not doing so, as we have seen, are deadly. The translation is mine and therefore I'm responsible for any mistakes, I believed it was important to get this material out in English, but in a couple of days, when I'm finished with all, I'll take to the task of correcting and editing once again.

Breivik Files September 2009 Part I

2009-09-07 09:23:03, same post was reposted at 09:23:59

Such cases must be considered simultaneously with similar cases where the media consistently ignores issues related to Muslims uprisings.

For example one should consider the July riots in Marseilles and other French cities where the media have been instructed not to report the news.

One can only wonder how many other riots have taken place in France and in other nations that we have never heard of. It is a trend at work in Western Europe in which there is a consensus over the full acceptance of media to suppress reporting on any such cases.

Estimates of the damage during the July uprisings in France: 800-1500 cars have been burnt and dozens of buildings as well, several people were injured (including police officers). There has been not one single article in mainstream media. I called up both TV2 and NRK, but they thought it was not important enough for the news. This is hardly surprising when 90-95% of European journalists are proponents of multiculturalism and do not want to harm the 'integration process' by telling the truth.

It is indeed a very frightening trend and the document hereunder makes evident how media serves as propaganda machine of the multicultural agenda.
The orders of "media blackout" have been strictly applied. Le Monde refused to respond, citing "ministerial instructions." "Yesterday morning, every journalist who came, even for the smallest piece of news, to the firemen, or gendarmes or police, heard the same answer: 'No fires'. In fact, the truth is quite different. Some of those we questioned admitted under their breath: 'We cannot say anything about the fires. We have received orders." In Lyons, the daily Le Progrès reports the same blackout: "Orders not to speak to the press were given to firemen, gendarmes and police."

2009-09-07 11:48:06

The following blog documents the number of white South-Africans that have been murdered in what begins to resemble a genocide motivated by systematic racism.

There are 3066 documented murders (the real numbers are just much higher)

About 200000-300000 white Africans have already fled from South Africa since the take over by the ANC.

2009-09-07 14:28:28


First of all, the question you should ask yourself is, if the cultural differences between Christian Norwegians and Christian Swedes are too big for them to live together, how could we then expect that Norwegians and Somalis live peacefully next to each other?

The ideology of multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) is an anti-European hate ideology that has no other purpose than the destruction of European culture, identity and of Christianity in general. I place multiculturalism with the other hate ideologies: Nazism (anti-Jewish), communism (anti-individualism) and Islam (anti-Kafr).

Japan, South Korea & Taiwan refused to implement multiculturalism (the only three Western countries that still thrive on mono-culturalism). They argued that social cohesion is identical with harmony within society. They still see with suspicion the strange European experiment.

2009-09-07 16:46:27


I encourage you to read books that explain the ideology of multiculturalism, the Frankfurt School and its origins. You can get started for example with the book "Defeating Eurabia".

The main problem in Western Europe is that there is only one alternative accepted, namely, cultural Marxism/multiculturalism.

Those who dare to criticize multiculturalism (and anchored in cultural conservative points of view) are nowadays immediately labelled as fascists/Nazis/racists. The problem is that the ideologies upon which political correctness is based cannot and will not tolerate alternative opinions and therefore are very intolerant.
FrP (Progress Party) is a victim of such intolerance.

2009-09-08 01:27:58


It seems that you're quite unenlightened and naive about the potential consequences of multiculturalism. I begin to wonder if maybe you are one of those who have never studied the historical demographic surveys of countries that have been multicultural and where Islam was involved?  ;)

You can look at the Lebanese demographic development. As we all know, the demographic development of Lebanon has been characterized by Islamic demographic warfare (invasion + high birth rates) combined with the emigration en masse of the Christian population. Lebanon had been once a Christian country. Thanks to the treats of multiculturalism, Lebanon has become today an unstable Muslim country marked by the murder, persecution and torture of non-Muslims:

Lebanon demographic development - (Christian-Muslim)[1]:

1911 - 21% Islam
1921 - 45%
1932 - 49%
1943 - 48%
1970 - 58% (Civil War 1975–1990 started after Islam reached 60%)
1990 - 65% (Christians were defeated)
2008 - 75%

On what ground do you think that Western European countries will not undergo the same fate?

1.     Tomass Mark, Game theory with instrumentally irrational players: A Case Study of Civil War and Sectarian Cleansing, Journal of Economic Issues, Lincoln; June 1997.

2009-09-08 15:46:51


Your argument suffices only for what you see. I have no doubt that your intentions are good. In any case, we disagree when it comes to ultimate goals. I wish I could discuss this freely.

'When you said what you don't want, you must also say what you want in its stead. Otherwise, nothing comes out of it.'

The problem to begin with is the prior assumptions for the discussion are nowhere to be found in Norway and Western Europe. We, the cultural conservatives, are already labeled as fascists/racists/Nazis by the political and media establishment because we dare to criticize multiculturalism (cultural Marxism), what is now completely unacceptable. It is seen as something as bad as the persecution of Jews in the 1930's or the Inquisition. None or very few are willing to share ideas that lead to practical solutions in an open forum ad this can only help to further stigmatize people in the future.


I have worked full time for more than three years oriented toward practical solutions (key notes written in English). My position is to contribute to areas that are on the side of current main focus. Much of the information I am dealing it is unknown to most people, even to you.

If you send me an e-mail to I will send you an electronic version once I'm finished.

Norway has until now been of little interest for me. The main focus must be the consolidation of an intellectual platform for cultural conservative organizations and individuals. These alliances are focused on delegitimizing multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) as the European hate ideology that it actually is. Its purpose (or indirect result) is acknowledged to be the destruction of Western civilization, national states, Western culture, norms, traditions, Christianity - the European/Norwegian identity.

If their work is completed, it is the basis for a Marxist super state (EUSSR) without the necessary cultural conservative and nationalist components that could stop Islam from completely dominating this new entity.

2009-09-08 17:00:26

Glad that you've found sources for the survey :)

This process (Marxist infiltration in European universities) began in 1945 after the Communists won the war.
The mistake of Europe was that they let the Marxists operate freely after the war. The Marxists of the generation of 1945-50 were the teachers of the 68 generation that today controls everything.

The infiltration by Marxists of the European universities (1945-1968) is described in detail here:


Yep, it is really bad (can it be possibly worse than it is now?).

By the way, I received the answers to two of my questions from the communist-in-chief in Aftenposten yesterday:

Aftenposten - interview with Hilde - Editor in Chief, came from Arbeidersbladet (labor party newspaper), many of the journalists at Aftenposten are old sympathizers of AKP and SV (worker's communist party and left socialist party).

What is the rationale behind Aftenposten, after 1972, to begin gradually supporting multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and in practice to cease being a media alternative for cultural conservatives? Does it have to do with pressure from the labor movement? Anders B

Afterposten is an independent newspaper, with liberal-conservative worldviews.-Hilde

What do you think of the fact that Norway joins the ranks of countries that no longer have any major cultural conservative newspapers (newspapers that are critical of multiculturalism)? Anders B

I believe that it is a problem that the Norwegian media are all too similar in their analyses and viewpoints. I think ti is because there is not really that big conflict in Norwegian politics. – Hilde

2009-09-12 12:18:50

Muslim riots in London yesterday – 11.09.09!

I reckon this is not going on the evening news today!

2009-09-13 18:07:16

4 weeks of Jihad in Gøteborg, Sweden. European media companies are refusing to report. This case and the Muslim riots in United Kingdom (also categorically ignored by 90% of journalists) could have influenced the Norwegian election. How can a democracy work when 98% of Western European journalists openly sympathize with "cultural Marxism"? These deliberate "media blackouts" are authoritarian in nature.

2009-09-13 18:24:47

98% of all Norwegian journalists are cultural Marxists, multiculturalists or politically correct or sympathize with the above.

The problem is that the institutions in Norway for example, Volda University College (a school of journalism) and Blindern (main campus of Oslo University) have been infiltrated already for decades (and most other schools for that matter) by them. These schools are today indoctrination institutions for future generations of cultural Marxists, multiculturalists, and the politically correct.

This was not obvious always. The cultural Marxists have had opportunities (they were never punished or imprisoned) to infiltrate our institutions since 1945. In 1968, the first batch of those indoctrinated with Marxism were ready to implement those doctrines. The results we see only today.

I have no idea how we are going to reverse this. It can be that it is Islam what can solve this problem on the ground in the course of 30-70 years, when the cultural Marxists will completely lose control over those forces.

I've always wondered; were there no cultural conservative or grass roots alternatives in 1968?
One can always see the images of the cultural Marxists protesting in the streets 1968-1972, but where were the cultural conservative forces then?

2009-09-13 23:03:08


Yep, you're absolutely right.

The cultural Marxists managed to take hold of crucial popular platforms that secured their victory:

- Sexual Liberation (weakening of the church, morals, patriarchy, family nuclei, birth rates)
- Feminism - positive and negative aspects (weakening of the church, morals, patriarchy, family nuclei, birth rates)
- Workers Rights - positive aspects
- Drugs, alcohol, parties (weakening of the church, morals, patriarchy, family nuclei, birth rates)
- Multicultural society - introducing exceptional possibilities, food, experiences (negative aspects: mass immigration, Islam, ghettos, enslavement, criminality, murder, thieves, violence, rape, weakening of identity, culture, unity, nation, etc.)

Too much out of these elements with few exceptions will drive us toward the chaos of a Marxist utopia.

The only pragmatic thing that we can do is working on cultural conservative consolation in the next 10/20/30/40 years in order to prepare ourselves for the moment when the gap will surely open (Fjordmann's scenario).

2009-09-14 09:18:03


Remarkable analysis. You're absolutely right. I haven't been present in the Norwegian debate, for until now I've debated mostly in English for several years, compiling key notes that I must yet finish.
I feel it is important to create a pan-European platform for rhetoric, targets, political analysis and research of historical factors of relevance in order to transfer this knowledge to every nation. The Pan-European/US milieu includes Robert Spencer, Fjordmann, Atlas, Anakleta and other +50 bloggers from the US and EU (and Facebook groups) and is the epicenter of policy analysis and has been already for some years.
Much of this knowledge has already been put forward through Document (impressed with the level of knowledge here); this indicates that this is going to form a new pan-European cultural conservative intellectual movement that has already agreed to the fundamental truths.

In the next 10/20/30 years we should focus on the following:

- The creation of a cultural conservative space (paper/online) in each country (our voice must reach out to the whole of Norway). The target is to relieve more Norwegians from their state of comma.
- Fundraise for this project through cultural conservative investors.
- Help to form/develop youth and action groups to represent our ideological platform (anti-racist but critical of multiculturalism and Islamization, etc) EDL/SIOE have provided us with outlines of how such an organization would look like. We can develop along the lines of SIOE of create a similar organization. EDL has been labelled with racism, yet they work hard to eliminate all this (all individuals who are racist and discriminatory will be thrown out). It is not easy to begin a grass roots/action movement in Norway when the government fuels support for everything to please everyone, except us.

This is just to get started. The gap will open at the earliest in 10 years, and at most there will be some 70 years, so we have plenty of time. But we should not waste time in order to confirm that we have a problem. It is essential that we focus on working upon these specific points.

Jarle, I will send you an e-mail :)

No comments: