Hate propaganda against Italy and Denmark is very hypocritical. Norway's own violent "Marxist/Islamist Youth" (Red Youth, SOS Racism, Blitz, in partnership with Jihad Youth) is not mentioned with one single word, even though they have harmed and terrorized hundreds of cultural conservatives in recent years in Oslo... Perhaps this is fine as long as the multiculturalists control the angry mobs?
It is unacceptable for the Labour Party, Socialist Party, Left Party, SP, CDP to finance these extremist elements.
It is amusing to see every single European cultural Marxist unravel in hatred against Denmark and Italy. The only Western European countries that have something of a wise leadership.
It is our obligation to lend support to the only anti-racist cultural conservative organization that is brave enough to parade in the streets of Oslo – SIOE. FpU is another anti-racist cultural conservative organization. Unfortunately these organizations are yet not brave enough to demonstrate against anything except taxes and the high price of fuel, etc.
This is completely understandable. Nobody has courage because they know they will be harassed and attacked. People however are getting tired of so much insecurity. The result of this is organizations like EDL and other vigilantes.
National Socialism has always been an extreme left ideology, then why are they trying constantly to place it strategically on side of the right?
If you hate capitalism and the free market, such as Marxists, Nazis and Islamists do, you are left wing, period.
Lars Gule, "This is simply unacceptable in a modern democratic state, based on religious freedom
and human rights."
The problem is that many cultural Marxists actually care little about religious freedom and human rights. They are cultural Marxists driven by contempt and hatred for the cultural conservatives, for European cultures, etc. Many are hiding behind false allegations of human rights and religious freedom as it serves the purpose of concealing their true motives.
Where have they been for the past 20 years on the criticism of Islam? Why have they been totally absent in this area? They have however spent much time attacking Christianity ...
It is increasingly difficult to deal with individuals that deliberately use deception to advance their agenda. The cultural Marxists have been hiding for 40 years behind humanistic principles even though their real agenda is to destroy the European tradition, culture, identity and sovereignty of nations. All in the name of human rights ...
You can not have a dialogue if one side is lying deliberately, again and again.
You are of course absolutely right. What I was referring to was individuals like Gule (leader of the Humanist Association) which only attacks Christianity while ignoring the spread of Islam.
It is tragicomic that an important NGO like Human-Ethical Foundation has been hijacked by a cultural Marxist, as it should have been led by a liberal anti-Jihadist of the Bruce Bawer kind.
Over the next 20 years, we MUST work hard to regain control of at least five major NGOs. The fact that the Progress Party has been cleared, makes this task easier.
It is a wonder to reflect that multiculturalism is a self-destructive ideology. The European cultural conservative movement is small at the moment but we are growing every day. And within 70 years, it's time for regime changes in Europe. At this point in time, the multi-culturalist regimes will either have imploded or have become very Stalinist.
Before that time, we must focus on the following:
1. Creating a cultural conservative newspaper with national distribution
2. Regaining control of several NGOs
3. Developing and consolidating the cultural conservative intellectual movement
4. Building an "EDL" type of youth organization
New Muslim riots in Marseilles
Check the youtube video:)
Do not know quite where to take it up but our own Fjordmann is about to be awarded a 3rd place position among the most recognized/influential European anti-Jihad/anti-multiculti/anti-Marxist intellectual/ bloggers.
After Gates of Vienna (No. 1) and New English Review (2 ) and then Fjordmann, who is actually in position to beat the Brussels Journal itself!
In other words, those who have not yet read Fjordmann's book, "Defeating Eurabia" have not been awake during class. I know it's hard to be a prophet in one’s own country but this is beyond all expectations. Congratulations Fjordmann:)
See the list here: http://infidelbloggerawards.blogspot.com/
Main problem when cultural conservatives and cultural Marxists debate is that their perception of reality are TOO different.
Many cultural Marxists view Israel as a "racist" state.
Cultural conservatives disagree, as they believe the conflict is based on Islamic imperialism, that Islam is a political ideology and not a race. Cultural conservatives believe Israel has a right to defend itself against the Jihad.
Cultural Marxists refuse to recognize the fact that Islam's political doctrine is relevant and quite essential. They can never admit to or support this because they believe that this is primarily about a race war - that Israel hates Arabs (the race).
As long as one can not agree on fundamental perceptions of reality, then it is too naive to expect that one may come to any conclusion at all.
Before one at all can begin to discuss this conflict, one must first agree on the fundamental truths of Islam's political doctrine.
Most people here have great insight in key Muslim concepts such as al-taqiiya (political deceit), naskh (Quranic abrogation) and Jihad. The problem is that cultural Marxists refuse to recognize these concepts.
They CAN not recognize these key Muslim concepts. For if they do so, the whole argument will go astray; the primary argument that Israel is a "racist state" and that this is a race war (Israelis vs. Arabs) and not defense against Jihad (Kafr vs. Ummah).
The fact that there are 40 different Jihad Fronts (wars) throughout the world is something they choose to ignore. For them Jihad does not exist. For them, these are 40 ethnic fronts (40 race wars) do not have anything to do with Islam AT ALL.
These Marxist theories are poorly conceived. For example, the so-called Bosniaks ARE ethnic Serbs. The only thing that separates the two groups is Islam. The examples are many.
Small nations like Norway have never had an independent, sovereign foreign policy.
However, they have always followed the big three European heavyweights - France, UK, Germany, adhering strictly. In other words, Norway has always copied these heavyweights and will always do so.
It is like comparing Belarus and Russia. We will always be Belarus and Russia is our three tigers.
UK is no different from Germany and France, all have chosen multiculturalism. The fact that the UK is skeptical towards the EU not about multiculti, but more about the UK being able to continue to have a special relationship with the U.S. (which is also 100% multiculti).
The only "Western" nations that refused to implement multiculti were Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and partially Finland.
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan have avoided the EU/US witch hunt because they are not Europeans.
If they had been Europeans, they had been also demonized as the Nazis, fascists and racists.
Why Norway is "more European" than the EU has anything to do with the "Little Man Syndrome". It can be likened to a "convert to Islam," who often is much more fundamentalist than even conservative Arab Muslims because they themselves feel they have much to prove ("Little Man Syndrome").
I assumed that the attackers were Muslims as soon as the Southern Philippines were mentioned. Everyone knows that the Southern Philippines is one of the world's 40 Jihad Fronts.
It makes little difference whether the victims were Christians or Muslims. Muslims in this part of the world are known to use very brutal methods.
There are a number of extremely brutal Islamist groups in the Southern Philippines - Abu Sayyaf Islamists (Al-Harakat al-Islamiyya) is one of them. They fund their organizations through kidnappings and beheadings of Christian civilians is part of their methods. Now, of course cultural Marxist Euro/U.S. MSM will not attempt to find connections between these groups and the attack. Again, we ordinary citizens have to do journalistic work FOR them ...
European and U.S. MSM attempt to lead their peoples into deception. I have not yet read ONE SINGLE PLACE in the MSM that the attackers were Muslims.
So what was really happened? A more conservative Muslim clan that made an example out of a more secular clan for unknown reasons?
Here you can read more about the Abu Sayyaf and other Islamist groupings in the Southern Philippines:
For almost 30 years various Muslim groups have been engaged in an insurgency for an independent province in the country.
Abu Sayyaf-al Qaeda group
The group received funding from Al-Qaeda in the early 1990s through Mohammad Jamal Khalifa, a brother-in-law of Osama bin Laden.   Al-Qaeda collaborator Ramzi Yousef operated in the Philippines in the mid-1990s and Trained Abu Sayyaf soldiers. The 2002 edition of the United States State Department's Patterns of Global Terrorism mention links to Al Qaeda.
Abdurajik Abubakar Janjalani's first recruits were soldiers of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF). However, the M.I.L.F. and M.N.L.F. deny having links with Abu Sayyaf. Both officially distance themselves from Abu Sayyaf because of its attacks on civilians and its supposed profiteering. The Philippines military, however, claimed that element of both groups Provide support to Abu Sayyaf.
If Document aspired to obtain a stamp of approval by Lars M and Gule, they would immediately have become irrelevant, nothing but fairy tale.
Most people here have nothing against Muslims in general, Muslims who do not follow the Quran, that is. It is the political doctrines within Islam that is a problem.
Key Islamic concepts such as al-taqiyya and naskh (Quranic abrogation) makes it more or less impossible to distinguish "moderate Muslims" (individuals who do not follow the Quran) from orthodox Muslims (“of the right faith”).
Who do you think first introduced the concept of "War is deceit "?;).
Lars M. and Gule,
What are your reflections on the political concepts of al-taqiyya and naskh?
Daniel Pipes: Leftism and Islam. Muslims, the warriors Marxists have been praying for.
What following summarizes the agenda of many cultural Marxists with Islam, and explains therefore also why they protect them at any cost. It thus also explains why we, the cultural conservatives, are against Islamization and the implementation of these agendas.
I have great respect for cultural Marxists who are tough enough to admit their true intentions. It is very annoying however, that 90% of all cultural Marxists lie directly to the people by hiding/covering up their agenda behind "humanism and human rights".
Are you tough enough to admit that this is your agenda, Gule, or do you still dare claim that you are fuelled by "humanism"? It becomes meaningless to discuss if one side refuses to admit his true intentions.
Most of us cultural conservatives are honest enough to admit that we are working against Marxism and Marxist principles (that is the main reason we are against the ongoing Islamization as we look at the Ummah as an entity that promotes Marxist principles, among others). So how come you are not tough enough to admit that your real agenda is to work FOR the implementation of Marxist principles and that you look at Muslims as a natural ally (for practical reasons and NOT humanistic ones).
By the way we all know what happened to the Christians Marxists in Lebanon. Lebanon was once a Christian country (80% in 1911). When the Muslims came to be in majority in 1970 (an increase of 40% in just 60 years), they declared war. The reason that they ended up in that situation was Marxists' appeasement policy (they allowed demographic warfare). The Marxists counted on that they would get an extra special dhimmi status, which of course did not happen. There are now fewer than 25% Christians in Lebanon and even the Christian Marxists live in a difficult situation. Do you really think you will get a special dhimmi status in a few decades in Western Europe when all the historical examples show that Christians Marxists end up being stabbed in the back again and again?
It is a strange thing why they never learn from historical examples? Cultural Marxists have much in common with Muslims, but in the end of the day they are anyway considered by the Ummah as God-hating and gay-loving infidels, which is incompatible with Islam. The result is that they time and again will be betrayed by the Ummah.
It is quite ironic that the Ummah has more respect for their opponents, the cultural conservatives, than their allies, the cultural Marxists, whom they only see as "temporary" useful idiots.
They may well enjoy the alliance for as long as it lasts:)
Very well written, Hans:)
Euro/US cultural Marxist MSM is now working on a comprehensive counter campaign consisting of psychological warfare against the Swiss people (as we saw against the Austrians a few years ago). They will be ridiculed, mocked, and threatened to change their point of view. They will be portrayed as Nazis, racists and fascists (monsters) and they are going to be intimidated to silence. There will possibly be a new referendum in a few months where only 40% is going to vote for. This is how the game works, unfortunately.
We should not underestimate the MSM and their highly efficient power to shape people's opinions.
The attack was most likely carried out by Muslims of Ingushetia, Dagestan and Chechnya.
There are now several key Jihadists who are wanted.
No "bomb" in other words ..., p
I do not understand why Dagbladet mentions the extreme right and the National Socialists? I have never ever heard of a right wing extremist or NS terrorist attack of importance on European soil. This sounds like cultural Marxist wishful thinking.
This is only the beginning of a protracted campaign of psychological warfare against the Swiss people. The worst of it all, is that it works very effectively, as we saw in Austria a few years ago. The Swiss people will succumb to the demonization, like the Austrians and Serbs before them.
The fact that the cultural Marxists control the Euro/U.S. MSM, 95% of NGOs and 80% of the political parties is perhaps the main reason why we must expect to struggle with multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) and the Islamization for at least 20-70 years.
Until this happens, it will, as Hårstad points out, be a further polarization between the cultural Marxists (elites) and the cultural conservatives (the people). Muslims nowadays comprise 20-25% in Oslo and similar percentage in other European capitals. 50-60% is the magic enslavement limit, and there are several cities that gradually come near this. Marseilles is the worst example in Western Europe at the moment with 38% Muslims. The city will have a Muslim majority within 20 years. It is thus conceivable that the battle for Islam's future in Europe will unfold in France within 20 years. Perhaps the consequence will be that France breaks out of the present U.S./Euro dominated multicultural world order seeking a new political alliance with Russia and some other small nations (hopefully followed by several European nations).
20 years at the earliest, is my bet (70 years maximum). So change will come, guaranteed, we just have to have a little patience.